·
It is
also the basic technique I use to collect the info I use to formulate a lesson.
·
I
outlined the first 4 steps last week.
·
Here, we
pick up where we left off.
5) ANALOGY OF FAITH
"If the
Scriptures be what they claim to be, the word of God, they are the work of one
mind, and that mind divine. From this it follows that Scripture cannot
contradict Scripture. God cannot teach in one place anything which is inconsistent
with what He teaches in another. Hence Scripture must explain Scripture.”
– Charles Hodge.
Analogy of Faith is
absolutely fundamental to good Bible study.
·
It
serves to insulate biblical interpretation from our own biases and baggage.
·
And as we
will see, it is going to change the entire direction we are going.
So in looking for
Scripture that is relevant to the subject matter of our text, I found some good
stuff.
·
These
are found by cross referencing, word searches, reading books and just knowing
your Bible.
·
And each
has things that fill out and compliment Jesus’ words in John 14.
1) 1 Corinthians 12:27–31 (ESV) — 27 Now you are the body of Christ and
individually members of it. 28 And
God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third
teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping,
administrating, and various kinds of tongues. 29
Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30 Do
all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all
interpret? 31 But earnestly desire
the higher gifts. And I will show you a still more excellent way.
·
Here Paul tells us that “gifts of healing” and “miracles”
are gifts of the Spirit.
·
And we know that within the body of Christ,
believers are endowed with different gifts of the Spirit – “Do
all work miracles? Do all possess gifts of healing?”
·
Yet
Jesus’ words in our text tell us “whoever
believes in me” will do His works (vs. 12).
·
So right
away, we see we might have to pull back from our initial conclusions.
·
Or
perhaps if Jesus is referring to His “works” as we argued, He is referring to
them not in form (the actual works) but function (their purpose).
See also:
·
Hebrews 2:3–4 (ESV) — 3 how shall we escape if we neglect such a
great salvation? It was declared at first by the Lord, and it was attested
to us by those who heard, 4
while God also bore witness by signs and wonders and various miracles and by
gifts of the Holy Spirit distributed
according to his will.
2) Matthew 7:21–23 (ESV) — 21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter
the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father
who is in heaven. 22 On that day
many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your
name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’
23 And then will I declare to
them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
·
Relevant to our text, we see here that
works/miracles themselves are not always associated with Jesus or even
believers.
·
The text suggests that miracles can and will be
performed by frauds – “workers of lawlessness”.
·
This is has a profound implication for our
investigation.
·
It tells us that there must have been something
else about Jesus’ works that set them apart.
·
In other words, there is a reason they were
significant other than the fact that they were just cool, supernatural acts.
·
And it appears that it has to do with the works’
standing before the Father – “does the will of my Father”.
·
This would imply (as mentioned above) that as
profound as miracles are it is not their “physicalness” or “form” that is most
significant but their “spiritualness” or “function”.
3) John 6:25–27 (ESV) — 25 When they found him on the other side of the sea, they
said to him, “Rabbi, when did you come here?” 26
Jesus answered them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, you are seeking me, not because
you saw signs, but because you ate your fill of the loaves.
27 Do not work for the food that
perishes, but for the food that endures to eternal life,
which the Son of Man will give to you. For on him God the Father has set his
seal.”
·
This verse is an example of Jesus’ apparent
preference for the importance of the “spiritualness” or function of reality
over the “physicalness” or form of reality with respect to His works/miracles.
·
So much so that he speaks of His act of feeding
the 5000 (one act) using two different categories.
o
“not because you saw signs” –
spiritualness/function
o
“you ate your fill of the loaves” –
physicalness/form
·
It seems that Jesus sees the primary purpose of His
works is to be a sign to point to God the Father and by extension, Himself (the
Son of Man).
·
The secondary purpose was to feed the hungry.
·
We know this because Jesus characterizes the
crowds’ reaction to Him in negative terms as working, “for the food that perishes”.
·
Implicitly, then, the proper “desired” reaction
is to embrace the “spiritualness” or “function” of the act and thereby
comprehend the meaning of the sign – that “the food that endures to eternal life”
is the Son of Man.
See also:
·
John 11:4 (ESV) — 4 But when Jesus heard it he said, “This
illness does not lead to death [physicalness/form]. It is for the glory of God
[spiritualness/function], so that the Son of God may be glorified [spiritualness/function]
through it [the physicalness/form].”
6) AFFIRMING THE NEGATIVE
Thus far, a
significant amount of info has been collected about our text.
·
This
info gives us a number of options as to the meaning of our text.
·
It is
useful to eliminate some of these options when possible.
·
Eliminating
options, i.e., determining what the answers to your questions can’t be, is what
I call “affirming the negative”.
·
Even if
we can’t arrive at a single consensus on the text’s meaning; it is important to
at least know what it can’t mean.
From our Word Study
and Analogy of Faith, we can confidently say that “works” can’t mean:
·
(1) Belief – or Jesus would be saying in John
14:11-12, “believe on account of beliefs” and “those who believe in me will
believe in me”.
o
This
doesn’t make sense, is redundant, and isn’t really saying anything.
·
(2) Evil Deeds – or Jesus would be saying that
“whoever believes in me will do the evil deeds that I do”.
·
(3) Good Deeds – because even an unbeliever can
perform the physical act of a good deed.
o
Our text limited the scope of Jesus’ words to “whoever
believes”.
So we are left with two possibilities.
·
(1) Revelation of God’s glory/light
·
(2) “The deeds of God and Jesus, specifically
the miracles” – BDAG
o
But our Analogy of Faith has called this meaning
into doubt.
·
This brings us to the Answers and Meanings of
our text.
7) ANSWERS AND MEANING
At the beginning of
our lesson, we asked the following questions:
·
1) What does Jesus mean by “works”?
·
2) What does He mean by “greater works” than His “works”?
·
3) What does “going to the Father” mean?
o And
why did Jesus qualify his statement with “going
to the Father”?
·
4) What future is in view?
We thought we
answered 1 until we came to Analogy of Faith.
·
We
answered 2, and will soon elaborate on it.
·
We
answered 3a but not 3b.
·
And we
answered, or at least narrowed down, question 4.
·
Now it
is time to use what we have uncovered and answer these questions as best we can.
What does Jesus mean by works?
·
Is it miracles/signs/wonders or not?
·
Or is it God’s glory?
My suggestion is
that it is both.
·
In the
context of Jesus’ ministry, referring to one without the other is problematic.
·
The
physical works/miracles were fundamental in establishing Jesus’ connection to
the Father.
·
God
ordained that Jesus’ 3 year ministry would be characterized by His miracle
working and teaching.
·
In other
words, Jesus’ calling card was not singing, farming, politicking, making money,
etc., but works and teaching.
·
As John
said in John 20:31, Jesus did signs and wonders, “so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God…”
Yet, it was what the
works pointed to that was really the most important part.
·
We saw
this clearly in our Analogy of Faith study.
·
In other
words, the works were so important because they pointed to and glorified God
the Father.
·
And they
authenticated the ministry of Jesus as coming from the Father.
But we have to be
careful here.
·
Given
our Analogy of Faith study, it is clear that Paul teaches not every believer
will perform miracles.
·
But in
our text, Jesus’ said “whoever
believes” will do His works.
·
So how can Jesus be referring to miracles in
our text while at the same time not be referring to them?
I think the best way
to look at it is as follows:
·
We need
to look at “works” as one coin with two sides.
·
The coin
needs both sides to be a coin – it can’t have just one side.
The two sides of the
“works” coin, as we alluded to earlier, are:
·
The “physicalness”
or “form” side of works
o Walking on water
·
The
“spiritualness” or “function” side of works
o Glorifying God the Father
o Authenticating Jesus’ ministry and
relationship to Father
You can’t divorce
the two; they are inseparable.
·
They are
dependent on each other.
·
As we
saw, if you have the “physicalness” part of the work but not the
“spiritualness” then Jesus said you are a “worker of lawlessness” because you are not operating under the
“will of my Father”.
·
And
conversely, if you have the “spiritualness” part of the work but not the
“physicalness” you are a “clanging cymbal” (1 Corinthians 13:1) or a “hearer of
the word and not a doer” (James 1:23).
·
And in
the case of Jesus, in the context of His ministry they were just as
inseparable.
o
John 2:11 (ESV) — 11 This, the first of his signs, Jesus did
at Cana in Galilee, and manifested his glory. And his disciples believed in
him.
o
John 11:4 (ESV) — 4 But when Jesus heard it he said, “This
illness does not lead to death. It is for the glory of God, so that the Son of
God may be glorified through it.”
So the final answer
to the works question I would suggest is:
·
Jesus,
in our text, is making a specific reference to the second side of the coin –
the “spiritualness” or “function” of His works.
·
Our “works”
are the same as His in that they will share the same “function” or
“spiritualness” as Jesus.
·
In other
words, they will glorify God.
How will we do this?
·
In other words, what will the “form” or
“physicalness” of our work be?
·
This is
where we see the importance of Jesus’ qualification – “because I am going to the Father”.
o The answer to question 3b.
·
This
exaltation of Jesus is why our “works” will glorify the Father.
·
His work
of the Gospel is done; “it is finished”.
·
He has
been vindicated and inaugurated the Kingdom of God.
·
And so
He has commissioned us to speak the Gospel; to be His emissaries.
·
Speaking
the Gospel is the form our “works” are to take.
·
And
because He intercedes for us and has given us the Spirit (John 14:16), our
works will be “greater works”.
o Further elaboration to question 2.
So we have now
attempted to answer all the questions.
·
It is
time to evaluate our answers against the commentaries.
8) COMMENTARIES
Study Bibles:
ESV Study Bible:
“While ‘signs’ in
John are characteristically miracles that attest to Jesus’ identity as Messiah
and Son of God, and that lead unbelievers to faith (see note on 2:11), Jesus’
“works” include both his miracles (see 7:21) and his other activities and
teachings, including the whole of his ministry” – ESV Study Bible.
·
Not bad,
but I think this is an oversimplification.
·
We are
concerned with the meaning in our context, not a broad, all inclusive
definition.
·
Highlights
a drawback of Study Bibles – they don’t show “their work”.
o Why are they “his other activities”?
MacArthur Study
Bible:
“Jesus did not mean
greater works in power, but in extent. They would become witnesses to all the
world through the power of the indwelling and infilling of the Holy Spirit
(Acts 1:8) and would bring many to salvation because of the Comforter dwelling
in them. The focus is on spiritual rather than physical miracles” –
MacArthur Study Bible.
·
Our
conclusions seem very similar – “spiritual” over “physical”.
Scholarly Commentaries:
Kostenberger:
“In the context of
John’s Gospel, however, “greater things” has primarily a qualitative dimension,
marking Jesus’ “signs” as preliminary and his disciples’ ministry as “greater”
in the sense that their ministry is based on Jesus’ completed cross-work” –
Kostenberger.
·
Kostenberger
doesn’t attempt to define “works”.
·
But our
conclusions about “greater works” are very similar – qualitative and not
quantitative.
D.A. Carson:
“The things (erga, ‘works’, cf. v. 11)
Jesus has been doing, and the greater things that follow, cannot legitimately
be restricted to deeds of humility (13:15) or acts of love (13:34–35), still
less to proclamation of Jesus’ ‘words’ (v. 10) Jesus’ ‘works’ may include more than his miracles; they never exclude
them” – D.A. Carson.
·
This
comment is somewhat different than the ESV Study Bible’s take.
·
Our
conclusions are very similar – can’t exclude works, but is more than works.
And with respect to
greater works, D.A. Carson says, “It cannot simply mean more works”.
·
“The
very basis for their greater works is his going
to the Father. Their works become greater precisely because of the new
order that has come about consequent on his going to the Father” – D.A. Carson.
·
In other works, it is not quantitative but
qualitative – works rooted in Jesus’ exaltation.
Beasley-Murray:
“‘the works that I do,’ in v 12a are clearly his miraculous works,
the “signs” of the ministry which have featured so largely in the so-called
“Book of Signs,” chaps. 2–12. It is illegitimate to identify them with the
“word” of Jesus on the ground of the close connection of word and works in
v 10bc; v 11b, with its parallel in 10:37–38, shows quite plainly that works
performed by Jesus that confirm the word spoken by him are in mind” –
Beasley-Murray.
·
This
comment is also somewhat different than the ESV Study Bible.
·
Our
conclusions are the exact same.
·
He
rightly considered the use of the word in the preceding verse.
He goes on to say:
“Is the point in
view rather the conveying to people of the spiritual realities of which
the works Of Jesus are “signs”? All the works of Jesus are significant of the
saving sovereignty of God at work among humankind through the eschatological
Redeemer. The main reality to which they point, and which makes their
testimony a set of variations on a single theme, is the life eternal of the
kingdom of God through Jesus its mediator” – Beasley-Murray.
·
Exactly
what our conclusions suggest.
John MacArthur:
“But those physical
miracles were not primarily what Jesus had in mind, since the apostles did
not do more powerful miracles than He had. When the Lord spoke of His followers
performing greater works, He was referring to the extent of the spiritual
miracle of salvation” – MacArthur.
·
Again,
our conclusions seem in line with this.
James Boice:
“There are only two
approaches to this verse other than saying that Jesus was simply mistaken. The
first takes it as referring to miracles but then either limits the reference [referring
to only the disciples] or seeks to explain why such miracles are not done today
[we don’t have enough faith]” – James Boice.
·
He goes
on to argue that both of these are wrong, in his view.
“Why, for instance, should the physical
miracles be considered “great” at all? Why should this be the thing
Jesus refers to? One clue that it is not comes from Luke 10, in a passage
that gives Christ’s response to the disciples after they had returned from
their first successful preaching mission. They had returned, we are told, “with
joy and said, ‘Lord, even the demons submit to us in your name’ ”
(v. 17). In other words, they were thrilled that they had been able to
cast out devils. But Jesus replied, “I have given you authority to trample on
snakes and scorpions and to overcome all the power of the enemy; nothing will
harm you. However, do not rejoice that the spirits submit to you, but rejoice
that your names are written in heaven” (vv. 19–20). Here Jesus explicitly
weighed the value of physical miracles over against the value of having
passed out of spiritual death into salvation and chose the spiritual
miracle without hesitation. If that is so in Luke 10, why should it not be
so also in our text from the last discourses?” – James Boice.
·
Our
conclusions are the exact same.
·
“spiritualness”/“function”
over “physicalness”/“form”
John Piper:
“So whatever the
specific works are that Jesus has in mind, what defines them here is that they
are pointers to Jesus which help people believe in him. They are a witness
along with Jesus words that lead people to faith. That’s what his works do, and
he is saying, at least, that’s what all believers’ works do. "Whoever
believes in me will do the works I do" — the works that point people to
faith. If you are a believer in Jesus, that’s what your life is. Your works,
your life is a display of the trustworthiness of Jesus. Here’s another support
for this. If we search for the exact phrase in verse 12a, “the works that I
do”, it occurs in one other place in John, namely John 10:25, “Jesus
answered them, ‘I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in
my Father’s name bear witness about me.” So again the function of the “works”
in John 10:25 is exactly the same as here in John 14:11–12. My
works are the things I do that bear witness about me. So at least we can say
with confidence that in John 14:12a Jesus means that all believers
will be marked by this: they will be so united to Jesus that they will carry on
his work by his power and do the kinds of things that will “bear witness” about
Jesus. They will point people to Jesus, and through Jesus to the Father” – John
Piper.
·
This
echoes our conclusions – bearing witness is speaking the Gospel.
·
We also
made the connection – Jesus Works=Reasons to Believe in our word study using
the same verses.
·
And of
course pointing to Jesus, the object of belief, is the “spiritualness” over the
“physicalness”.
·
He is
the real food… “food that endures to eternal life” (see our Analogy of Faith discussion).
Lessons for Us:
So it appears we did
all right.
·
This is
the beauty of good Bible Study.
·
You can
often discern what the greatest Bible scholars discern.
·
There is
great satisfaction in this – not just in matching their insight but primarily
in learning God’s Word on a deep level.
·
And the
more you do it, the better you will get.
·
It is
for these reasons I strongly encourage you to engage in this kind of study – at
least once a month.
·
Going
straight for the answers in commentaries is of very little long term value.
·
After
all, in Acts we are taught to search the Scriptures!
·
I hope
this “behind the scenes” study was helpful.
BTW – Now
that we have figured out what the text means, we can now safely see what it
means for us.
·
If I
were doing a normal lesson on this text, I would do just that.
·
I would use
all the info we just collected to flesh this out.
·
And
typically I would organize it around the text and questions that arise from the
text.
No comments:
Post a Comment