Last week we
saw how the work of God in the history of the Israelites “melted” the hearts of the
residents of Jericho.
·
And in Rahab’s case, the “melting” was such that
she acknowledged Yahweh as “God in the heavens above and on the earth
below” (Joshua 2:11).
·
The book of Hebrews confirms for us that her
confession was a trusting on par with Abraham.
·
She was not simply a calculating pagan adding
one more god to her collection and using it to her advantage.
In fact, it
is argued that given the arrangement of Joshua 2, her confession of faith is
the central point of Joshua 2.
·
Dale Ralph Davis’ says Rahab’s faith is the meat
of a literary “structure sandwich”.
Structure
Sandwich (chiastic structure):
·
Commission by Joshua, 1a
o
Arrival/concern: protection of the spies, 2–7
§
Confession of faith, 8–14
o
Escape/concern: protection of Rahab and Co.,
15–21
·
Return to Joshua, 22–24
It needs to
be pointed out that her confession contains both elements of trust that
we spoke of a few weeks ago.
·
(1) Done Work – A recognition of the “done” work
of God – Exodus.
·
(2) Future Promise – A trust in the future
promise of God – Delivery of Promise Land to Jews at Jericho’s expense.
o
The second is implied because she asks to be
saved – “deliver our lives from death” (Joshua 2:13).
Note also
that her confession here also acknowledges the following:
·
“Genuine faith never rests content with being
convinced of the reality of God but presses on to take refuge in God. Rahab not
only must know the clear truth about God but also must escape the coming wrath
of God” – Dale Ralph Davis.
We also saw
that Rahab pleaded with the Jewish spies for mercy on her.
·
She asked that they “deal kindly with my father’s
house” (Joshua 2:12)
·
And she even asked them to enter into an oath
with her.
o
“please swear to me by the LORD” –
Joshua 2:12
·
The spies obliged her request – “our
life for yours even to death” (Joshua 2:14).
·
More on this in a moment.
Her words to
the spies in 2:12 also hint that more was to come from this interaction.
·
She asked that they give her “a
sure sign” – Joshua 2:12.
Sworn Oath:
Joshua
2:15–17 (ESV) — 15 Then she let them down by a rope through the window, for
her house was built into the city wall, so that she lived in the wall. 16
And she said to them, “Go into the hills, or the pursuers will encounter you,
and hide there three days until the pursuers have returned. Then afterward you
may go your way.” 17 The men said to her, “We will be guiltless with
respect to this oath of yours that you have made us swear.
In spite of
the fact that 15 comes before 16 as written, in reality, the conversation most
likely took place before the men were lowered down the wall.
·
David Howard, Woudstra, Hess and others address
this issue, no reason to get into it here.
In the
course of the conversation, she tells them to go in the opposite direction of
the king’s posse.
·
Whether or not the waiting 3 days is supposed to
be a connection to three days Jesus was dead, we don’t really know.
·
But it is clear that there life depends on
following her instructions – “hide there three days”.
Importantly,
for our purposes, we have the spies confirming that they did indeed swear an
oath with Rahab in verse 17.
·
This swearing an oath with Rahab requires that
we contend with the words of Moses.
·
Deuteronomy 7:1–2 (NIV) — 1 When the Lord your God brings you into the land
you are entering to possess and drives out before you many nations—the
Hittites, Girgashites, Amorites, Canaanites, Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites,
seven nations larger and stronger than you—2 and when the Lord your God has delivered them over to
you and you have defeated them, then you must destroy them totally. Make
no treaty with them, and show them no mercy.
·
Deuteronomy 20:16–18 (NIV) — 16 However,
in the cities of the nations the Lord
your God is giving you as an inheritance, do not leave alive anything that breathes.
17 Completely destroy them—the Hittites, Amorites, Canaanites,
Perizzites, Hivites and Jebusites—as the Lord
your God has commanded you.
It seems
that, “The entire incident relates a situation expressly forbidden to Israel
and articulates an opposition to the introductory affirmations of obedience” –
David Howard.
·
So were
the spies disobedient to God’s command?
·
Were they
bamboozled by a shrewd pagan prostitute?
The answer,
of course, is to be found in the meat of the “structure sandwich”.
·
Rahab had confessed belief in Yahweh.
·
Her melted heart was circumcised.
James Boice
sums up Rahab’s faith this way:
·
She “put her life on the line”
·
She “repudiated her own past and people”
·
She “identified with the Jewish people”
So the
answer to the two questions is no.
·
Why?
·
Because, what we have here is more OT Gospel.
·
Or to put another way, this is the “outworkings
of the Abrahamic covenant” – David Howard.
How so?
·
We musn’t lose sight of the fact that the
nations were to be blessed through God’s election of Israel.
·
So the faith that united Abraham to Christ and
put him in a place of being seen as obedient to the law did the same for Rahab.
·
And as Paul tells us, in Christ nationality is
meaningless.
David Howard
puts it as follows:
·
“By this [her faith], she made herself an
Israelite, so to speak. She chose to cast her lot with Israel’s God, not the
Canaanites’ gods. Prior to this confession of faith, the spies showed no
intentions of entering into any treaties or agreements with her or any other
Canaanite. However, her confession of faith made all the difference. She was, in
effect, no longer a Canaanite” – David Howard.
The book of
Joshua and Gospel of Matthew reveal just how true Howard’s statement that she
was “no longer a Canaanite” is:
·
Joshua 6:25 (ESV) — 25 But Rahab the
prostitute and her father’s household and all who belonged to her, Joshua saved
alive. And she has lived in Israel to this day, because she hid the messengers
whom Joshua sent to spy out Jericho.
·
And we know from Matthew that, “She married a
Jew and became an ancestor of the Lord Jesus Christ. She married a man of the
tribe of Judah named Salmon. Their son was Boaz, who married Ruth the
Moabitess. Their son was Obed, who was the father of Jesse, who was the father
of King David (see Matt. 1:5–6)” – James Boice.
Scarlet Cord:
Joshua
2:18–21 (NIV) — 18 unless, when we enter the land, you have tied this
scarlet cord in the window through which you let us down, and unless you have
brought your father and mother, your brothers and all your family into your
house. 19 If any of them go outside your house into the street, their
blood will be on their own heads; we will not be responsible. As for those who
are in the house with you, their blood will be on our head if a hand is laid on
them. 20 But if you tell what we are doing, we will be released from the
oath you made us swear.” 21 “Agreed,” she replied. “Let it be as you
say.” So she sent them away, and they departed. And she tied the scarlet cord
in the window.
We have in
this text the sure sign and the seal of the sworn oath that Rahab asked for
earlier.
·
The spies say to her that when they return all
will be well with her if she has “tied this scarlet cord in the window”.
·
The presence of the scarlet cord will secure her
safety.
·
And it will save not only her from certain
destruction, but also her family, as long as she and they are “in
your house”.
There is but
one thing that will negate this salvation.
·
“But if you tell what we are doing, we will
be released from the oath…” – verse 20.
·
It is clear that this certainly means that she
can’t betray the spies.
o
Hiding in the hills, for example.
·
But it may also mean that she must remain silent
about Jericho’s coming destruction.
·
No doubt, she had many friends that she wanted
to warn, but the text seems to indicate that only her family could be saved.
o
This is unclear.
Symbolism
of the Scarlet Cord:
How far can we take the symbolism of the
scarlet cord?
·
Mark Woudstra tells us that some of the Church
fathers considered the cord “a symbol of the blood of Christ”.
·
But interestingly, Howard, Woudstra, and Boice
are hesitant to see the cord as a type for Christ.
o
“…it is questionable as to whether the typology
pointed out here—that the scarlet thread represents shed blood or the blood of
Christ and that Rahab represents the Church—is truly warranted” – David Howard.
·
They give a number of reasons – no time to get
into them here.
So does it symbolize anything?
·
There are at least three things that seem
to find consensus.
(1) David Howard sees a clear connection
between both the scarlet cord and the women of our text and Genesis 38:28.
·
Genesis 38:28 (ESV) — 28 And when she was
in labor, one put out a hand, and the midwife took and tied a scarlet [sani] thread
on his hand, saying, “This one came out first.”
·
Here we
have Tamar tying a “scarlet thread” around one of her twin son’s wrists at his
birth – Zerah.
o
Zerah is
actually mentioned in Matthew’s genealogy of
Jesus.
So what is the connection?
·
“Rahab and Tamar are linked together in being
two of the four foreign women in this same genealogy. Now we see a further link
between the two women in the scarlet cord. In God’s providence, these two
women—both of them foreigners, societal outcasts, prostitutes, and in
possession of a scarlet cord—came to be part of the lineage of Jesus Christ
himself” – David Howard.
BTW – If this connection is legit, then
it would seem that the scarlet cord can represent Christ.
·
If He is
the one that ultimately links Rahab and Tamar then doesn’t He participate in
the symbolism?
(2) Passover
·
“…there is a remarkable parallel between the
cord that marked her house and the blood of the lambs spread on the doorposts
and lintels of the Jewish homes in Egypt when the angel of death passed over
the Jewish homes and families” – James Boice.
The
similarities are many:
·
Blood of Lamb as sign of protection – Scarlet
Cord as sign of protection
·
Must remain in house to be safe – Must remain in
house to be safe
·
Lives of the faithful spared – Lives of the
faithful spared
BTW – As with (1), if the scarlet cord
parallels Passover and Passover points to Christ, then here again we seem to be
saying that the scarlet cord hints at Jesus.
(3) The Gospel
·
Given one and two, and what we’ve said about Rahab’s
faith, it is no wonder that John Piper suggests that the cord represents the
Gospel.
·
In fact, he wrote a poem called “The Gospel of
the Wall of Jericho” to drive this point home.
Safely Home:
Joshua
2:22–24 (ESV) — 22 They departed and went into the hills and remained there
three days until the pursuers returned, and the pursuers searched all along the
way and found nothing. 23 Then the two men returned. They came down from
the hills and passed over and came to Joshua the son of Nun, and they told him
all that had happened to them. 24 And they said to Joshua, “Truly the Lord has given all the land into our
hands. And also, all the inhabitants of the land melt away because of us.”
Our final
verses make clear that Rahab kept her end of the sworn oath.
·
She didn’t rat out the spies.
·
“…the two men returned.”
The spies
then gave a report to Joshua about what they had found – “told him all that happened”.
·
But, the author of Joshua summed up the report
in one sentence.
·
“Truly the Lord
has given all the land into our hands. And also, all the inhabitants of the
land melt away because of us.”
This
sentence reveals some pretty cool things.
·
(1) The spies are convinced that the promise
land will be theirs.
·
(2) And there is the added bonus that the people
of Jericho are terrified – “the inhabitants…melt away because of us”.
o
Panic-stricken condition – TWOT.
It is
unclear (translations differ) if their certainty about the promise land is
because of the fear they encountered.
·
Let us hope that it is based on their trust in
God – the surety of His Done Work and Future Promises.
·
For these are the very things that Rahab cited
for the fear and for her faith.
Finally, the
spies’ report harkens back to the recon mission Joshua was a part of 40+ years
earlier.
·
At that time the Jewish spies (except Joshua and
Caleb) were the ones terrified.
·
It seems God’s judgment upon Israel to wander
the desert for 40 years bore some fruit.
No comments:
Post a Comment